MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160202485 · doi:10.1109/pcicon.1999.806453

Methods for the control of large medium voltage motors; application considerations and guidelines

2003· article· en· W2160202485 on OpenAlex
John Kay, Richard Paes, J.G. Seggewiss, Robert Ellis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsRockwell Automation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInduction motorTransformerTorqueAutotransformerVoltageCapacitorMotor soft starterComputer scienceControl engineeringTroubleshootingDirect torque controlProcess (computing)EngineeringAutomotive engineeringReliability engineeringElectrical engineeringDistribution transformer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Starting and control methods available for medium voltage induction motors, (2.4 kV-7.2 kV), in the petrochemical industry are continually changing in terms of application considerations due to the evolution of available products and changing characteristics of the machine and processes. This paper summarizes several common methods and provides application guidelines for proper selection considering the distribution system, driven equipment, speed-torque issues, process requirements, starter method limitations and economics. Starting means reviewed include medium voltage soft starters, variable frequency drives, and autotransformer, capacitor, reactor, captive transformer, across the line controllers as well as fluid couplers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207