Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head: Vascular Hypotheses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vascular hypotheses provide compelling pathogenic mechanisms for the etiology of avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH). A decrease in local blood flow of the femoral head has been postulated to be the cause of the disease. Several studies in human and animal models of ANFH have shown microvascular thrombosis. Endothelial cell damage could be followed by abnormal blood coagulation and thrombus formation with any resulting degeneration distal to the site of vascular occlusion. Other studies suggest that thrombophilia, particularly impaired fibrinolysis, plays a potential role in thrombus formation in ANFH. Reduction in shear stress due to decreased blood flow could lead to apoptosis of endothelial cells, which can ultimately contribute to plaque erosion and thrombus formation. Dysregulation of endothelial cell activating factors and stimulators of angiogenesis or repair processes could also affect the progression and outcome of ANFH. Likewise, regional endothelium dysfunction (RED), referred to as a potential defect in endothelial cells located in the feeding vessels of the femoral head itself, may also have a crucial role in the pathogenesis of ANFH. Molecular gene analysis of regional endothelial cells could also help to determine potential pathways important in the pathogenesis of ANFH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".