MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160231548 · doi:10.1109/vetec.1994.345126

Adaptive equalization for a multipath fading environment with interference and noise

2002· article· en· W2160231548 on OpenAlexaff
N.W.K. Lo, D.D. Falconer, A.U.H. Sheikh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultipath propagationComputer scienceAdditive white Gaussian noiseGaussian noiseAdjacent-channel interferenceFadingImpulse noiseBandwidth (computing)Bit error rateElectronic engineeringChannel (broadcasting)Noise (video)Interference (communication)AlgorithmTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Investigates the average bit error rate (EER) and outage performance of a TDMA indoor wireless cellular system employing an adaptive fractionally spaced decision feedback equalizer (DFE) in the presence of adjacent and co-channel interference (ACI and CCI) and additive Gaussian noise. There exist performance gains in the presence of strong interference and negligible ambient noise relative to the equivalent stationary noise case. Moreover, a directly adapted RLS DFE performs better than a computed MMSE DFE which employs estimates of the channel impulse response (CIR) and interference plus noise autocorrelation. However, these comparative performance gains are compromised by the presence of appreciable noise power and/or more interferers than the receiver can process effectively, The use of a wide receiver bandwidth yields a performance improvement for channel spacings which allow for sufficient spectral overlap of the ACI with the desired signal bandwidth. Thus, a reduction in channel spacing increases the radio capacity while maintaining a desired average EER or outage performance.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207