El régimen jurídico de la seguridad social en Costa Rica y el Convenio núm.102 de la Organización Internacional del Trabajo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En Costa Rica existe una pluralidad de regímenes, especialmente en el ámbito del empleo público, que salvo las prestaciones por desempleo, regulan el resto de los beneficios previstos en el Convenio núm. 102 sobre la Seguridad Social. Aunque se han llevado a cabo reformas reglamentarias atendiendo las observaciones de la Comisión de Expertos en la Aplicación de Convenios y Recomendaciones de la Organización Internacional del Trabajo, que han reducido sensiblemente aquellos aspectos de la normativa interna que no armonizaban con el Convenio núm. 102, las iniciativas legislativas más significativas que se han aprobado durante esta década, reduciendo los regímenes de privilegio, fortaleciendo el régimen general administrado por la Caja Costarricense del Seguro Social y creando un sistema de capitalización individual de pensiones complementarias, no han sido motivadas ni orientadas por aquella norma internacional.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".