MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160257373 · doi:10.1139/z02-099

Sperm mixing in the Alpine newt (<i>Triturus alpestris</i>)

2002· article· en· W2160257373 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jan Rafiński, Artur Osikowski

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Behavior and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologySpermathecaTriturusSpermZoologyHuman fertilizationSpawn (biology)ReproductionEcologyAnatomyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In polyandrous females the ultimate stage of cryptic female choice may involve egg–sperm interactions during different phases of fertilization. This form of sperm discrimination is possible only when sperm from different males have simultaneous access to eggs at the site of fertilization. In polyandrous newts of the genus Triturus, eggs are fertilized internally by sperm stored for an extensive period of time in the tubular spermatheca. The extent of sperm mixing, which is a necessary condition for cryptic female choice involving sperm–egg interactions, was studied in doubly mated female Alpine newts, Triturus alpestris. Using an allozyme marker the paternity of offspring sired by the two males was established in both series of larvae reared from eggs produced consecutively over short period of time (ca. 2 h) and batches of eggs collected during longer periods of time (up to 26 days). Significant sperm mixing was unequivocally demonstrated by the mixed paternity of the progeny produced in series. The paternity pattern in batches of eggs collected during longer periods of time showed neither significant predominance of either male in the progeny nor any effects of sperm stratification in the tubules of the spermatheca.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicAnimal Behavior and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207