MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160276372 · doi:10.3109/19401736.2010.532329

DNA barcoding of morid cods reveals deep divergence in the antitropical<i>Halargyreus johnsoni</i>but little distinction between<i>Antimora rostrata</i>and<i>Antimora microlepis</i>

2011· article· en· W2160276372 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMitochondrial DNA · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIdentification and Quantification in Food
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyDNA barcodingGenetic divergenceMitochondrial DNAMeristicsZoologyTaxonEcologySpecies complexTaxonomy (biology)Genetic diversityPhylogenetic treeGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: DNA barcoding strongly suggests that specimens of the slender codling (Halargyreus johnsonii) from New Zealand and Tasmania belong to a different species to H. johnsonii reported from other areas. RESULTS: Sequence divergence between the two groups averaged 3.95%, much higher than within-group divergences of 0.03 and 0.02% for specimens, respectively, from New Zealand-Tasmania and from the North Pacific, Atlantic Ocean, and Southern Ocean. CONCLUSION: Meristic data for specimens from New Zealand and from the Southern Ocean north of the Ross Sea support the conclusion of two species. DNA barcodes for two sister taxa, Antimora rostrata and Antimora microlepis, show low intra-species (0.3-0.06%) and inter-species (0.23%) divergence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it