MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160301165 · doi:10.1109/icccn.2003.1284145

Routing anomaly detection in mobile ad hoc networks

2004· article· en· W2160301165 on OpenAlexaff
Bo Sun, Kui Wu, Udo W. Pooch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceIntrusion detection systemComputer networkAnomaly detectionMobile ad hoc networkRouting protocolMarkov chainDynamic Source RoutingOptimized Link State Routing ProtocolDestination-Sequenced Distance Vector routingWireless Routing ProtocolFalse alarmWireless ad hoc networkRouting (electronic design automation)Data miningArtificial intelligenceWirelessMachine learningNetwork packet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intrusion detection systems (IDSs) for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) are necessary when we deploy MANETs in reality. In this paper, focusing on the protection of MANET routing protocols, we present a new intrusion detection agent model and utilize a Markov chain based anomaly detection algorithm to construct the local detection engine. The details of feature selection, data collection, data preprocess, Markov chain construction, classifier construction and parameter tuning are provided. Based on the routing disruption attack aimed at the dynamic source routing protocol (DSR), we study the performance of the algorithm at different mobility levels. Simulation results show that our algorithm can achieve low false positive ratio, high detection ratio, and small MTFA (mean time to the first alarm), especially when the mobility is low. Detailed analysis of simulation results is also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207