Mechanical dewatering of chopped alfalfa using an experimental piston-cylinder assembly
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sinha, S., Sokhansanj, S., Crerar, W.J., Yang, W., Tabil, L.G., Khoshtaghaza, M.H. and Patil, R.T. 2000. Mechanical dewatering of chopped alfalfa using an experimental piston-cylinder assembly. Can. Agric. Eng. 42:153-156. Experiments were conducted to investigate the quantity and quality of the chopped alfalfa pulp and juice extracted in a piston-cylinder assembly. Singleand doublemacerated alfalfa chops at an initial moisture content of 75.7% (wet mass basis) were pressed under constant or increasing pressures up to 20 MPa. The pressed pulp and the juice were analyzed for the contents of dry matter, protein, and β-carotene. Approximately 52% of the total water content was removed at pressures higher than 4 MPa. The pressure required to extract extra juice from already pressed pulp increased exponentially. The juice had on average solids content of 1012% (dry mass basis). On a dry matter basis, there were no reductions in either protein content or β-carotene in the pulp.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it