MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160403829 · doi:10.2514/1.j053207

Laminar Boundary-Layer Response to Spanwise Periodic Forcing by Dielectric-Barrier-Discharge Plasma-Actuator Arrays

2014· article· en· W2160403829 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersDivision of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMichigan State UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPlasma actuatorMechanicsBoundary layerDielectric barrier dischargeHarmonicsMaterials scienceReynolds numberVortexPhysicsBoundary layer thicknessPlasmaVoltageTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An extensive parametric study of the response of a Blasius boundary layer to forcing by spanwise arrays of plasma actuators was performed. The actuator arrays are designed to produce streamwise-oriented vortex pairs, which cause streaks of alternating low and high streamwise velocity. This work is motivated by the closed-loop control of bypass transition. The streaks are measured using hot-wire anemometry over a streamwise distance of approximately 100 boundary-layer thicknesses. The resulting spanwise periodic disturbance velocity is decomposed into spanwise Fourier modes. Typically, at least 90% of the disturbance energy is contained within a mode related to the spanwise spacing of the exposed electrodes and its first three harmonics. Along the streamwise direction, the growth and decay characteristics of the disturbance are considered for various actuator geometries, as well as excitation voltages and frequencies for a freestream velocity of . The total disturbance energy is shown to scale with the actuator power consumption. Changes in the excitation voltage influence the energy distribution between Fourier modes due to the effect of voltage on the plasma extent and plasma-induced velocity, which changes the separation between vortices generated by the actuators. The induced disturbance is found to be most closely represented by a single Fourier mode when the electrode width is approximately one-third of the electrode spacing. For the other electrode width, significant energy appears at higher harmonics of the electrode spacing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it