Bibliographic record
Abstract
SETTING: Tertiary adult congenital cardiac referral centre. DESIGN: Retrospective cross sectional analysis. OBJECTIVES: To report our 20 year experience with adult Fontan operations, and to compare late outcome in patients with single ventricle with definitive aortopulmonary or cavopulmonary shunt palliation. PATIENTS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients older than 18 years undergoing Fontan operation between 1 January 1982 and 31 December 1998 were identified. Mortality and late outcome were derived from hospital records. These patients were compared with a cohort of 50 adults with single ventricle who had not undergone a Fontan operation. RESULTS: 61 adults, median age 36 years (range 18-47 years), with a median follow up of 10 years (range 0-21 years) were identified. Actuarial survival was 80% at one year, 76% at five years, 72% at 10 years, and 67% at 15 years. Compared with before the Fontan operation, more patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I or II at the latest follow up (80% v 58%, p < 0.001). Systolic ventricular function deteriorated during follow up such that 34% had moderate to severe ventricular dysfunction at the latest follow up compared with 5% before Fontan (p < 0.001). Arrhythmia increased with time (10% before Fontan v 57% after 10 years, p < 0.001). Fontan patients had improved NYHA functional class, ventricular function, atrioventricular regurgitation, and fewer arrhythmias than the non-Fontan group at the latest follow up. CONCLUSION: The Fontan operation in adults has acceptable early and late mortality. Functional class, systolic ventricular function, atrioventricular regurgitation, and arrhythmia deteriorate late after surgery but to a lesser degree than in non-Fontan patients with a single ventricle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".