Methyldopa Hepatotoxicity: A Paradoxical High-Risk Pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alpha methyldopa is one of the preferred medications for hypertension control in pregnant women because of its low teratogenic profile. However, when pregnant women on this medication develop an acute or chronic liver damage, methyldopa is not thought to be responsible. At 18 weeks gestation of a high-risk pregnancy, a patient with chronic hypertension controlled on methyldopa 500 mg three times daily, presented with jaundice, dark-colored urine and elevated liver function enzymes. Following worsening symptoms, inconclusive radiological and negative immunological laboratory investigations, she was hospitalized and a diagnosis of drug-induced hepatotoxicity was confirmed with a liver biopsy. Her symptoms resolved with withdrawal of the offending medication and prednisone taper, which led to diabetes mellitus in pregnancy. Paradoxically, following the diagnosis and discontinuation of methyldopa, the patients’ blood pressure remained controlled off antihypertensives. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2015;4(3):271-274 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jcgo343w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".