MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160531753 · doi:10.1145/1065579.1065800

A non-parametric approach for dynamic range estimation of nonlinear systems

2005· article· en· W2160531753 on OpenAlexaff
Bin Wu, Jianwen Zh, Farid N. Najm

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDatapathNonlinear systemDynamic rangeGaussianAlgorithmParametric statisticsRange (aeronautics)Orthonormal basisHigh dynamic rangeIndependent component analysisGaussian processMathematical optimizationMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been widely recognized that the dynamic range information of an application can be exploited to reduce the datapath bitwidth of either processors or ASICs, and therefore the overall circuit area, delay, and power consumption. Recent advances in analytical dynamic range estimation methods indicate that by systematically decomposing the system inputs into orthonormal random variables using a mathematical procedure called polynomial chaos expansion (PCE), output statistics of interest can be obtained for both linear and nonlinear systems. Despite its power for capturing both spatial and temporal correlation, the application of this method has been limited only to near-Gaussian inputs. In this paper, we propose the first algorithm with the capacity of handling both near-Gaussian and non-Gaussian input signals. Our method is based on the use of independent component analysis (ICA). Our experiments show that the new algorithm can reduce the original relative errors of 2nd order moments from 25% - 65% to 1% - 2%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207