MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160540259 · doi:10.1086/345585

Competition in the Interexchange Telecommunication Market

2003· article· en· W2160540259 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Clement G. Krouse, Jongsur Park

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Law and Economics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMerger and Competition Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCournot competitionOligopolyEconomicsEconometricsCompetition (biology)MicroeconomicsPrice elasticity of demandMarket structureQuarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using an econometric model that allows the nature of the oligopoly interaction to be determined by the data, we estimate residual demand elasticities for the switched inter‐LATA (local access and transport area) services of AT&T, MCI, and Sprint. For the 9‐year period from the third quarter of 1989 to the first quarter of 1998, these estimates fall in the relatively inelastic −1.5 to −1.9 range. Statistical tests of the several elasticity relationships decisively reject hypotheses of perfect competition and a Cournot interaction but do not reject the hypothesis that the market functioned as a coordinated oligopoly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Law and EconomicsSame topicMerger and Competition AnalysisFrench-language works237,207