MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160566328 · doi:10.1080/15487760108415433

Family intervention in an early psychosis program

2001· article· en· W2160566328 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean Addington, Donald Addington, Barbara Jones, Tim Ko

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric Rehabilitation Skills · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStressorDistressPsychological interventionSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Intervention (counseling)Mental healthPsychiatryPsychosisEarly psychosisPsychologyFamily memberFamily therapyMedicineClinical psychologyFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interventions with families of individuals with schizophrenia have primarily aimed at reducing relapse rates. In the Calgary Early Psychosis Program, we have different goals for our work with families. First, we educate families so that: (1) they understand the possibility of relapse and the resultant biological and psychological risks, (2) they can identify potential relapses, and (3) they can cope with relapses in order to minimize the time their relative experiences psychotic symptoms. Secondly, we want to reduce the distress and stressors they, as family members, may be experiencing. This is vital not only for their own mental health but also to contribute to a stress-free environment for their ill family member. This paper will describe our family approach, which is specifically designed to meet the needs of first episode families over a three-year period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychiatric Rehabilitation SkillsSame topicFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessFrench-language works237,207