MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160569106 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2013-0250

Microstructural analysis of asphalt mixtures using digital image processing techniques

2014· article· en· W2160569106 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Minnesota
KeywordsAsphaltMaterials scienceComposite materialMicrostructureRheometerDigital image analysisBendingDigital image processingImage processingRheologyImage (mathematics)Computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the internal microstructure of asphalt mixture is analyzed through digital image processing (DIP) of two-dimensional asphalt mixture images. A set of 12 mixtures prepared with two binders, two air voids percentages, and different recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) contents is used. First, small asphalt mixture beams of the same size of bending beam rheometer specimens are prepared for the images acquisition. Then, based on mixture volumetric properties, a three-phase material model is obtained. Finally, 2- and 3-point correlation functions of the material phases are numerically evaluated. No significant differences were observed in the microstructure and spatial distributions of aggregates, asphalt mastic, and air voids for asphalt mixtures containing up to 40% of RAP. However, an increase in auto correlation length (ACL) was found for RAP mixtures in comparison with the conventional mixtures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.682

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it