Observing regional-scale pack-ice decay processes with helicopter-borne sensors and moored upward-looking sonars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The variability of Arctic pack-ice parameters (e.g. extent and ice type) has been monitored by satellite-borne sensors since the early 1960s, and information on ice thickness is now becoming available from satellite altimeters. However, the spatial resolution of satellite-derived ice properties is too coarse to validate fine-scale ice variability generated by regional-scale interaction processes that affect the coarse-scale pack-ice albedo, strength and decay. To understand these regional processes, researchers rely on other data-monitoring platforms such as moored upward-looking sonars and helicopter-borne sensors. Backed by observations, two such regional-scale pack-ice decay processes are discussed: the break-up of large pack-ice floes by long-period waves generated by distant storms, and the spring decay of first-year-ice ridges in a diverging pack-ice environment. These two processes, although occurring on regional spatial scales, are important contributors to the evolution of the total pack ice and need to be included in global climate models, especially as the conditions for their occurrence will alter due to climate change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".