Bibliographic record
Abstract
Formant frequencies of snore and breath sounds represent resonance in the upper airways; hence, they change with respect to the upper airway anatomy. Therefore, formant frequencies and their variations can be examined to distinguish between snore and breath sounds. In this paper, formant frequencies of snore and breath sounds are investigated and automatically grouped into 7 clusters based on K-Means clustering. First, formants clusters of breath and snore sounds of all subjects were investigated together and their union were calculated as the most probable ranges of the formants. The ranges for the first four formants which span the main frequency components of breath and snore sounds were found to be [20-400]Hz, [270-840]Hz, [500-1380]Hz and [910-1920]Hz. These ranges were then used as priori information to recalculate the formants of snore and breath sounds separately. Statistical t-test showed the 1(st) and 3(rd) formants to be the most characteristic features in distinguishing the breath and snore sounds from each other.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".