Frailty models for pneumonia to death with a left‐censored covariate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Frailty models are multiplicative hazard models for studying association between survival time and important clinical covariates. When some values of a clinical covariate are unobserved but known to be below a threshold called the limit of detection (LOD), naive approaches ignoring this problem, such as replacing the undetected value by the LOD or half of the LOD, often produce biased parameter estimate with larger mean squared error of the estimate. To address the LOD problem in a frailty model, we propose a flexible smooth nonparametric density estimator along with Simpson's numerical integration technique. This is an extension of an existing method in the likelihood framework for the estimation and inference of the model parameters. The proposed new method shows the estimators are asymptotically unbiased and gives smaller mean squared error of the estimates. Compared with the existing method, the proposed new method does not require distributional assumptions for the underlying covariates. Simulation studies were conducted to evaluate the performance of the new method in realistic scenarios. We illustrate the use of the proposed method with a data set from Genetic and Inflammatory Markers of Sepsis study in which interlekuin-10 was subject to LOD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".