Perspective 3-D Euclidean Reconstruction With Varying Camera Parameters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper addresses the problem of 3-D Euclidean structure and motion recovery from video sequences based on perspective factorization. It is well known that projective depth recovery and camera calibration are two essential and difficult steps in metric reconstruction. We focus on the difficulties and propose two new algorithms to improve the performance of perspective factorization. First, we propose to initialize the projective depths via a projective structure reconstructed from two views with large camera movement, and optimize the depths iteratively by minimizing reprojection residues. The algorithm is more accurate than previous methods and converges quickly. Second, we propose a self-calibration method based on the Kruppa constraint to deal with more general camera model. The Euclidean structure can be recovered from factorization of the normalized tracking matrix. Extensive experiments on synthetic data and real sequences are performed to validate the proposed method and good improvements are observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it