Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| April 01, 2009 Initiation of the Western Interior foreland basin Andrew D. Miall Andrew D. Miall * 1Department of Geology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B1, Canada *E-mail: miall@geology.utoronto.ca. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Geology (2009) 37 (4): 383–384. https://doi.org/10.1130/focus042009.1 Article history first online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Andrew D. Miall; Initiation of the Western Interior foreland basin. Geology 2009;; 37 (4): 383–384. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/focus042009.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search In this issue of Geology, Fuentes et al. (2009, p. 379) present a new subsidence plot and age data from detrital zircons that help to constrain the date of initiation of the foreland basin in Montana (United States). They offer these data as evidence for the resolution of a controversy regarding the initiation of foreland basin sedimentation in the Western Interior. However, their discussion raises the question of what geological data constitute the definitive evidence of the foreland basin style of sedimentation, and therefore the criteria that should be used to define its commencement. A useful definition of... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".