MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160630340 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/sup022

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and atherosclerotic plaque: a key role in the cardiovascular protection of patients with coronary artery disease

2009· article· en· W2160630340 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Claude Tardif

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal Supplements · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerindoprilMedicineCardiologyCoronary artery diseaseInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionAngiotensin-converting enzymeBradykininEndothelial dysfunctionEndotheliumIntravascular ultrasoundACE inhibitorBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In EUROPA, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) perindopril on top of other preventative therapies reduced the risk of major coronary events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest) by 20% when compared with placebo (P = 0.0003) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). These cardiovascular benefits may be attributable not only to the blood pressure-lowering effect of the drug, but also potentially to a direct cardioprotective vascular effect as determined in two substudies of EUROPA. Analysis of intravascular ultrasound data from the PERSPECTIVE substudy indicated that perindopril treatment may be associated with favourable patterns of coronary remodelling that are associated with plaque stabilization and may induce regression of non-calcified lesions. In the PERTINENT substudy, there were reductions in markers of coronary vascular endothelial cell dysfunction and the rate of endothelial cell apoptosis in perindopril recipients. Experimental data suggest an advantage of perindopril over other ACEIs at the level of tissue ACE inhibition and relative selectivity for bradykinin, which may explain the mechanism of the beneficial effect of perindopril on the endothelium. These differences may underpin the differential results in large clinical trials of ACEIs in patients with stable CAD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal SupplementsSame topicCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207