15-Deoxy-Δ12,1412,14-prostaglandins D2 and J2 Are Potent Activators of Human Eosinophils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
15-Deoxy-Delta(12,14)-PDJ(2) (15d-PGJ(2)) is a degradation product of PGD(2) that has been proposed as an anti-inflammatory compound because of its various inhibitory effects, some of which are mediated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma. In contrast to its reported inhibitory effects on macrophages and other cells, we found that this compound is a potent activator of eosinophils, inducing calcium mobilization, actin polymerization, and CD11b expression. It is selective for eosinophils, having little or no effect on neutrophils or monocytes. 15d-PGJ(2) has an EC(50) of approximately 10 nM, similar to that of its precursor, PGD(2). The concentrations of 15d-PGJ(2) required to activate eosinophils are thus much lower than those required for its anti-inflammatory effects (usually micromolar). 15-Deoxy-Delta(12,14)-prostaglandin D(2) (15d-PGD(2)) is also a potent activator of eosinophils, with an EC(50) about the same as that of PGD(2), whereas Delta(12)-PGJ(2) is slightly less potent. Eosinophils pretreated with PGD(2) no longer respond to 15d-PGJ(2), and vice versa, but in both cases the cells still respond to another eicosanoid proinflammatory mediator, 5-oxo-6,8,11,14-eicosatetraenoic acid. This indicates that the effects of 15d-PGJ(2) are mediated by the DP(2)/chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells that has recently been identified in eosinophils. 15d-PGJ(2) is selective for the DP(2) receptor, in that it has no effect on DP(1) receptor-mediated adenylyl cyclase activity in platelets. We conclude that 15d-PGJ(2) and 15d-PGD(2) are selective DP(2) receptor agonists that activate human eosinophils with potencies at least 100 times greater than those for the proposed anti-inflammatory effects of 15d-PGJ(2) on other cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".