MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160639345 · doi:10.1109/aict-iciw.2006.15

A Framework to Add AAA Functionalities in IP Multicast

2006· article· en· W2160639345 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticastComputer networkComputer scienceIP multicastInternet Group Management ProtocolXcastSource-specific multicastProtocol Independent MulticastPragmatic General MulticastMulticast addressAuthentication (law)Computer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multicasting, as an operational paradigm, has not been widely adopted until now, in spite of the advantages of its lower resource utilization and bandwidth conservation. This is due to lack of control over the multicast groups, which implies that the Network Service Provider has no simple mechanism for generating revenue from IP multicast. The Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (AAA) protocols are being used very successfully to ensure revenue generation by controlling access to network resources in unicast communication. AAA protocols can be used for multicast based applications to authenticate the end users, to establish their authority to participate in the group, and to keep a record of their group activity. In this paper, we have proposed a framework to deploy AAA protocols in such uses. The edge-router will be the perfect place to implement the AAA client functions. A modification to the Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) is also required to carry end user authentication data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it