MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160639345 · doi:10.1109/aict-iciw.2006.15

A Framework to Add AAA Functionalities in IP Multicast

2006· article· en· W2160639345 on OpenAlexaff
Salekul Islam, J. William Atwood

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticastComputer networkComputer scienceIP multicastInternet Group Management ProtocolXcastSource-specific multicastProtocol Independent MulticastPragmatic General MulticastMulticast addressAuthentication (law)Computer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multicasting, as an operational paradigm, has not been widely adopted until now, in spite of the advantages of its lower resource utilization and bandwidth conservation. This is due to lack of control over the multicast groups, which implies that the Network Service Provider has no simple mechanism for generating revenue from IP multicast. The Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (AAA) protocols are being used very successfully to ensure revenue generation by controlling access to network resources in unicast communication. AAA protocols can be used for multicast based applications to authenticate the end users, to establish their authority to participate in the group, and to keep a record of their group activity. In this paper, we have proposed a framework to deploy AAA protocols in such uses. The edge-router will be the perfect place to implement the AAA client functions. A modification to the Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) is also required to carry end user authentication data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, SecurityFrench-language works237,207