MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160644532 · doi:10.1680/jees.2014.9.1.38

Biofiltration of methane using an inorganic filter bed: influence of inlet load and nitrogen concentration

2014· article· en· W2160644532 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Josiane Nikiema, Matthieu Girard, Ryszard Brzeziński, Michèle Heitz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandfill Environmental Impact Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiofilterInletMethaneNitrogenNitrateEnvironmental chemistryChemistryEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An upflow lab-scale biofilter was operated with an inorganic filter material to control methane emissions. The influence of the inlet load on methane removal was investigated and the maximum elimination capacity obtained was 36 g/(m 3 ·h) for an inlet load of 95 g/(m 3 ·h). The influence of the nitrogen concentration, which was provided in the form of nitrate through a nutrient solution, was also determined. We established that the optimum nitrogen concentration required for biofilter operation decreases with the methane inlet load. In fact, it was around 0·75 g/L for inlet loads comprised between 55 and 95 g/(m 3 ·h) and of 0·50 g/L when the inlet load was comprised between 20 and 55 g/(m 3 ·h). During this study, a nitrogen concentration of 1·00 g/L inhibited methane removal in the biofilter. In addition, the use of a nitrogen concentration superior to its optimum level can cause, in the long-term run, severe damages to the biofilter performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesFrench-language works237,207