MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160647678 · doi:10.1109/tim.2009.2038029

Calibration of Rogowski Coils at Frequencies up to 10 kHz Using Digital Sampling

2010· article· en· W2160647678 on OpenAlexaff
Branislav Djokić

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMagnetic Field Sensors Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRogowski coilCalibrationSampling (signal processing)Current transformerNotationElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringMathematicsTransformerVoltageEngineeringElectromagnetic coilDetectorArithmeticStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new system for calibration of Rogowski coils at frequencies up to 10 kHz, based on a reference current transformer, a reference ac shunt, and a digital sampling system, is described in the paper. The calibration system has been automated, and its performance has been evaluated. At the frequency of 10 kHz, the calibration system is capable of generating currents up to 100 A. At power frequencies, it is capable of generating currents up to 2000 A. The best uncertainties$(k = 2)$of the calibration system are estimated to be less than 500$\mu\hbox{A/A}$for magnitude and 500$\mu\hbox{rad}$for phase at 10 kHz and an order of magnitude better at power frequencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicMagnetic Field Sensors TechniquesFrench-language works237,207