Quantum dots as phototoxic drugs and sensors of specific metabolic processes in living cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When conjugated to CdSe/ZnS nanocrystals (quantum dots), the nucleobase adenine and the neurotransmitter dopamine quench fluorescence emission from in a manner strongly dependent upon the size of the quantum dot. The degree of quenching serves to predict the efficiency with which the conjugates are able to enter living cells. Along with quenching, the presence of specific receptors on the cells is necessary for QD binding, entry, and phototoxicity. Toxicity is manifested by opening of large membrane pores and by oxidative DNA damage, and does not require the release of Cd+2. In bacterial cells, light exposure is necessary for uptake, and procedures to reduce toxicity eliminate labeling. In mammalian cells, antioxidants prevent toxicity but not QD uptake, leading to QD-loaded cells that are nonfluorescent before light exposure. These findings provide a general procedure for rational design of nanoparticle-based photosensitizing drugs and for "off-on" fluorescent labels
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".