MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160682719 · doi:10.1080/09511920903440339

Optimal resource allocation for hybrid flow shop in one-of-a-kind production

2010· article· en· W2160682719 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Xinggang Luo, Wei Li, Yiliu Tu, Deyi Xue, Jiafu Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPruningProduction (economics)Resource (disambiguation)Operations researchComputer scienceInterval (graph theory)Resource allocationPlan (archaeology)Industrial engineeringMathematical optimizationEngineeringMathematicsEconomicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In one-of-a-kind production (OKP) companies, the number of production resources in each work centre of a production line is flexible in shifts because the resource demands of customer orders are always different from shift to shift. In this paper an optimisation model is established to achieve an optimal resource allocation plan ensuring that all jobs are finished in a given time interval with a minimum number of resources and without any buffer overflow. A branch-and-bound algorithm is developed to solve the problem. Two theorems are proved and applied in the algorithm to improve its pruning efficiency. A real industrial application is implemented for Gienow Windows and Doors Ltd. based on this model and algorithm. Experimental results show that this method is effective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Computer Integrated ManufacturingSame topicScheduling and Optimization AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207