Evaluation of bronchodilator responses in patients with “irreversible” emphysema
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Given the emerging physiological and clinical rationale for pharmacological lung-volume reduction, assessment of volume responses to bronchodilators is likely to be highly relevant in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The authors examined the magnitude of lung-volume reduction after acute bronchodilator treatment in patients with advanced emphysema. Eighty-four stable patients with emphysema (mean+/-SEM forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1): 32+/-1% predicted) performed spirometry and body plethysmography before and 15-30 min after 200 microg salbutamol. Only irreversible patients with a postbronchodilator change in FEV1 <10% pred were considered in this study. Postsalbutamol, the majority of subjects (83%) had significant improvements in one or more lung volumes: on average, residual volume (RV), functional residual capacity (FRC), inspiratory capacity (IC), forced vital capacity and slow vital capacity changed by -18+/-2, -10+/-1, 8+/-1, 9+/-1 and 7+/-1% pred (p<0.0005 each). Total lung capacity (TLC) decreased 0.12+/-0.04 L (p<0.01). Change in IC reflected change in FRC (r=-0.60, p<0.0005), but more strongly in the 57% of patients with no significant change in TLC (r=-0.93, p<0.0005). The magnitude and frequency of volume responses were greatest in patients with the most severe COPD; for example, RV decreased by 0.51+/-0.09 L (23+/-4% pred) and 0.27+/-0.04 L (14+/-2% pred) in severe and moderate subgroups, respectively. Significant reductions in lung hyperinflation occurred in the absence of a change in forced expiratory volume in one second after low-dose salbutamol in a majority of patients with advanced emphysema; the greatest changes occurred in those with the most severe disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".