MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160696548 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2006.070

An Ichnological and Sedimentological Facies Model for Muddy Point-Bar Deposits

2006· article· en· W2160696548 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyFaciesPoint barGeochemistryBar (unit)Point (geometry)GeomorphologyPaleontologyPetrologyGeometryOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Detailed analysis of fine-grained clastic deposits associated with the macrotidal estuarine mouth of the Shepody River, New Brunswick, Canada, concentrated on identifying the ichnological and sedimentological characteristics of tidally dominated point bars and their adjacent tidal flats. The aim of the study was to establish an ichnological facies model for similar deposits. Within the study area, the distribution of ichnological structures and sedimentary characteristics such as grain-size distribution and total organic content are associated with bar elevation (i.e., upper, middle, or lower intertidal), tidal-bank slope, and the local hydraulic processes. The distribution of animal traces is also influenced by the duration of intertidal exposure and sedimentation rates. Polykladichnus- and Skolithos-like traces characterize upper-subtidal and lower-intertidal zones of the point bars; Arenicolites-, Diplocraterion-, Polykladichnus-, Palaeophycus-, and Planolites-like forms are pervasive in middle-intertidal zones; and, Siphonichnus- and Polykladichnus-like burrows typify the upper-intertidal point bars and the tidal flats. The size and diversity of the burrowing fauna are affected by the chemistry of the depositional waters and by seasonal variations in composition and temperature of those waters. The extreme seasonality of the area favors opportunistic fauna and thereby contributes to an impoverished, brackish-water trace assemblage. Geomorphologically, the area is dominated by point-bar and tidal-flat deposits, which comprise rhythmic bedding, composed of interlaminated to thinly interbedded silty and sandy mud. Point-bar bedding dips channelwards and represents mud-dominated inclined heterolithic stratification (IHS). The IHS alternates between burrowed and laminated beds. Laminated beds contain rhythmic lamination. Cyclic variations in laminae thickness are attributed to neap–spring variation in tidal-current strength. The burrowed interbeds exhibit high degrees of bioturbation that eradicate the preexisting lamination. The intercalation of laminated and burrowed beds represent seasonal variations in the depositional system: laminated beds characterize early winter and early spring sedimentation, and the bioturbated beds represent late spring through fall deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it