MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160827929 · doi:10.1109/biocas.2006.4600344

A flexible high voltage biphasic current-controlled stimulator

2006· article· en· W2160827929 on OpenAlexafffund
Patrick Nadeau, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersCanada Research ChairsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCMC Microsystems
KeywordsGenerator (circuit theory)WaveformElectrical impedanceElectrical engineeringVoltageElectrodeChipHigh voltageSignal generatorMaterials scienceComputer scienceOptoelectronicsPower (physics)PhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The efficiency of implantable stimulation systems depends in large proportion of the electrode-tissue interface condition and in the choice of appropriate stimuli waveform. In this paper, we present an integrated flexible stimuli generator dedicated for high current stimulation in large electrode-tissue contact impedance. The system, powered by a single 3.3 V supply level, includes an integrated high voltage generator in order to supplies the output stage with -10 V/+10 V. High voltage parts are implemented in a 9 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> chip using a 0.8 um high voltage process. For area and power efficiency concern, the control unit of the whole device is implemented in a standard 0.18 um technology and use 1.96 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> of silicon area. Preliminary results indicate that the stimuli generator can deliver a stimulating current of 2 mA in electrode-tissue impedance as high as 9.125 kOmega.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.625

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringFrench-language works237,207