MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160828557 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2000.951647

2.4-5.8 GHz CMOS LNA's using integrated inductors

2002· article· en· W2160828557 on OpenAlex
R.A. Rafla, Mourad N. El-Gamal

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCMOSInductorTransceiverNoise figureElectrical engineeringPower consumptionLow-noise amplifierElectronic engineeringPower (physics)TelecommunicationsEngineeringPhysicsAmplifierVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three 2-3 V-supply LNA's were designed in 0.35 /spl mu/m and 0.25 /spl mu/m digital CMOS processes, for center frequencies of 2.4, 3, and 5.8 GHz. The circuits' components are fully-integrated making them suitable for integration into a complete transceiver. The measured forward transmissions S21 for the 2.4 and 3 GHz LNA's are 6.5 and 8 dB respectively, at relatively low power consumption of 20 mW, when excluding the output stages. The noise figures achieved are 2.5 and 3 dB respectively. Simulation of the 5.8 GHz LNA yielded 10 dB of forward gain and 3 dB of noise figure, at 20 mW of power consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it