Edge-Based and Efficient Chromaticity Spatio-spectral Models for Color Constancy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fast and accurate estimation of the transformation imposed by the illuminant to the colors of an image taken under that illuminant is of crucial importance in real-time computational color constancy applications. To this end, we present an edge based and an efficient chromaticity spatiospectral model which are modified versions of the spatiospectral method introduced by Chakrabarti et al [1]. As compared with the conventional color constancy methods, the spatio-spectral model improves the accuracy of estimation at the cost of increasing the execution time and storage dramatically. This increase makes the spatio-spectral model impractical and inappropriate for real-time applications. Our proposed methods aim at reducing the computational burden and required storage for the spatio-spectral modeling while retaining its accuracy of estimation. Evaluation of the performance of the proposed methods on a synthetic color image database and also the “Color Checker” database [2] are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it