MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160875174 · doi:10.7202/900665ar

L’engagement d’élèves déficients mentaux pendant des séances d’éducation physique

2009· article· fr· W2160875174 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jocelyn Gagnon, Marielle Tousignant, Denis Martel

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l éducation · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPhysical Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les auteurs décrivent les types d’engagement d’élèves déficients mentaux moyens pendant des séances d’éducation physique. Vingt-neuf élèves, choisis au hasard parmi cinq groupes à effectif réduit, ont fait l’objet d’une observation directe systématique. Leurs comportements ont été classifiés selon quatre degrés d’intensité d’engagement : déviance, inconsistance, application, enthousiasme. Les résultats révèlent que les élèves passent près de la moitié du temps à attendre sans pouvoir s’engager dans une activité. Cependant, ils manifestent généralement beaucoup d’application lorsqu’ils s’engagent dans les tâches proposées par l’enseignant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.393
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.550
GPT teacher head0.560
Teacher spread0.010 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des sciences de l éducationSame topicPhysical Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207