Recombinant expression and affinity purification of a novel epididymal human sperm-binding protein, BSPH1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mammalian sperm undergo a series of maturation steps before acquiring fertilization competence. Our previous work demonstrated the importance of binder of sperm (BSP) proteins in bovine sperm capacitation. Recent studies identified a BSP-homologous DNA sequence in the human genome (BSPH1) and mRNA expression in the epididymis. The aim of this study was to develop an efficient method to express and purify recombinant human BSPH1. BSPH1 accumulates in inclusion bodies when expressed with an N-terminal hexahistidine tag in BL21 (DE3) Escherichia coli cells. Similar to other BSP proteins, BSPH1 contains two fibronectin type-II (Fn2) domains, each consisting of two disulfide bonds. Therefore, when expressed in Origami B (DE3)pLysS cells, a strain favouring disulfide bond formation, an improvement in soluble protein yield was observed. However, protein was aggregated, which complicated subsequent purification steps. Expression of glutathione-S-transferase-tagged BSPH1 in both cell types also led to accumulation in inclusion bodies. Finally, successful production of soluble and active protein was achieved when BSPH1 was expressed as a His(6)-thioredoxin-tagged protein. Recombinant protein bound phosphatidylcholine liposomes, low-density lipoproteins and human sperm, therefore displayed binding activities common to all BSP-family proteins, which may indicate similar biological function(s). This approach was also successful in producing the murine orthologue of BSPH1 in the soluble and active form. Thus, fusion to thioredoxin and expression in Origami B (DE3)pLysS cells may constitute a strategy applicable to all BSP-family proteins, and possibly to other proteins containing Fn2 domains. This work is important to elucidate the role of BSPH1 in human sperm functions and fertility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".