Anthocyanins, Phenolics, and Antioxidant Capacity of Processed Lowbush Blueberry Products
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Temperature, pH, and oxygenation of extracted blueberries were examined to determine how processing may affect the antioxidant capacity of blueberry food products. Extraction of fruit at 60 °C resulted in higher recovery of anthocyanins and antioxidant capacity, compared to extracts obtained at 25 °C. Subsequent room temperature storage resulted in losses in anthocyanins and antioxidant capacity only in those extracts obtained at 60 °C. Antioxidant capacity was greatest in pH 1 extracts, compared to extracts at pH 4 and 7. Oxygenation was detrimental to both anthocyanins and antioxidant capacity. Antioxidant capacity of processed products was positively correlated with anthocyanin (R = 0.92) and phenolic content (R = 0.95), and negatively correlated with % polymeric color (R = ‐0.64). In general, products that had experienced less processing had a higher antioxidant capacity. Simple colorimetric tests for anthocyanins and phenolics proved to be useful indicators of antioxidant capacity in processed products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it