MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2160932692 · doi:10.1109/pac.1989.72895

VAX Q-bus to CAMAC systems crate interface for long CAMAC branches

2003· article· en· W2160932692 on OpenAlexafffund
S.K. Sarkar, W.R. Roberts, M.M. Mouat, Y. N. Miles, P. Bennett, Alan Purvis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersTRIUMF
KeywordsComputer Automated Measurement and ControlInterface (matter)CrateComputer scienceOperating systemComputer hardwareData acquisitionEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The TRIUMF Central Control System (CCS) was to be upgraded to use Q-bus-based VAXs. The CCS consists of multiple computers interfaced to a CAMAC Executive Crate with long parallel branches containing multiple pairs of differential branch extenders (DBE). The Creative Electronics System SCI 2280 systems crate interface used for the Q-bus VAX requires the CAMAC operation to complete synchronously with the Q-bus cycle in less than the Q-bus timeout period. This translates to a maximum branch length of about 150 meters containing three pairs of DBEs, which was not adequate. A Q-bus-to-SCI 2280 interface was built to allow CAMAC cycles to be decoupled, when desired, from the Q-bus cycles. When cycles are decoupled, completion of the CAMAC part can be ascertained by testing flags in the interface. The interface design and operation are described and the results of tests using a VAX 3500 are given.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1060.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→