Perceived Control and Quality of Life in Asthma: Impact of Asthma Education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between patients' perception of asthma control and generic and asthma-specific quality of life (QOL) post-completion of a behavior modification-based adult asthma education program. A secondary objective was to examine associations between changes in perceived control of asthma and generic and asthma-specific QOL. Outcome measures were collected via an asthma management questionnaire (AMQ), generic (SF-36) and asthma-specific (AQLQ) QOL questionnaires, and a perceived control of asthma questionnaire (PCAQ). The cohort (n = 55) consisted of predominately female (75%), married (56%), middle income (46%) patients with severe asthma (65%) who had completed a university or college education (20%) and were working full-time (42%). The mean age was 45.2 (SD = 17.5) years. Perceived control of asthma and generic and asthma-specific quality of life significantly improved after completing the behavior modification-based adult asthma education program. Significant associations were found between perceived control of asthma (PCAQ) and both generic (SF-36) and asthma-specific QOL (AQLQ). Baseline PCAQ was related to all four domains and the total score of the AQLQ and 5 of the 8 domains of the SF-36. PCAQ was related to 3 of the 4 AQLQ domains at 3 months and total AQLQ score at both 1 and 3 months post-education. PCAQ was related to all 8 domains of the SF-36 at 1 month; and 4 of 8 domains at 3 months. Change in PCAQ (deltaPCAQ) was related to change in symptom score, emotional functioning, and total AQLQ score from baseline to 1 month and change in symptom score from baseline to 3 months. In conclusion, perceived control of asthma in patients participating in a behavior modification-based asthma education program was related to generic and disease-specific QOL. An improvement in PCAQ was associated with improved QOL following asthma education. Using the PCAQ as part of an asthma educational needs assessment may be a quick, simple way to identify and target education towards asthma patients with low perceived control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".