MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160985421 · doi:10.1049/iet-map.2013.0459

Design and analysis of a low‐profile directive antenna array for multi‐element terminals

2014· article· en· W2160985421 on OpenAlexafffund
G. Brzezina, Amir Ali Basri, Amir Ghasemi, John Sydor, Alex Vukovic

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Microwaves Antennas & Propagation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAntenna arrayDirectiveAntenna (radio)Electronic engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsComputer scienceAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors verify the benefits of directivity for a 4 × 4 multiple‐input multiple‐output (MIMO) system in a non‐line‐of‐sight indoor propagation environment. A novel prototype with four directive antennas has been designed to have full aggregate azimuth coverage, which is conveniently achieved without the need for electronic or mechanical beam‐steering. In this way, it captures similar multipath content to that of an equivalent omnidirectional device as confirmed by the field measurements. This coupled with the inherently larger gain of directive antennas renders the prototype a better choice for multi‐antenna receivers. The prototype design makes it possible to use a simple but effective power‐based antenna selection algorithm. Importantly, this algorithm achieves close to the theoretical maximum channel capacity when only two radio frequency chains are available at the receiver. For the first time, these results show that in an MIMO indoor environment directive receive antennas are a viable option.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Microwaves Antennas & PropagationSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207