MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2160996469 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2007.86

Statistically Robust Transceiver Design for Broadcast Channels with Uncertainty

2007· article· en· W2160996469 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Botros Shenouda, Timothy N. Davidson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelecommunications linkBase stationComputer scienceTransceiverPrecodingChannel state informationChannel (broadcasting)Metric (unit)MIMOComputer networkMathematical optimizationWirelessMathematicsTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the design of linear transceivers for the downlink of a multiuser communication system in the presence of uncertain channel state information (CSI) at the base station. We focus on systems in which the base station has multiple antennas and each user has a single antenna, and we consider a stochastic model for the uncertainty in the CSI. We study the joint design of a linear precoding matrix at the base station and the equalizing gains at the receivers so as to minimize the average, over channel uncertainty, of the total mean-square-error (MSE). By generalizing the MSE duality between the broadcast channel (BC) and multiple access channel (MAC) to scenarios with uncertain CSI, we obtain a relation between the desired robust broadcast transceivers and the corresponding transceivers that optimize the same performance metric for the dual multiple access channel. Furthermore, we present a convex optimization formulation for the robust transceivers of the dual MAC that can be efficiently solved. Our simulations indicate that the proposed approach can significantly reduce the sensitivity of the downlink to uncertainty in the CSI, and can provide improved performance over that of existing robust designs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.386
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207