MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161034992 · doi:10.1086/498526

Distribution and Clinical Impact of Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus Genotypes in Hospitalized Children over 2 Winter Seasons

2005· article· en· W2161034992 on OpenAlexaff
Rodica Gilca, Gaston De Serres, Mireille Tremblay, Marie‐Louise C. Vachon, Éric Leblanc, Michel G. Bergeron, Pierre Déry, Guy Boivin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenotypeVirusIntensive care unitRespiratory systemBiologyVirologyPolymerase chain reactionRespiratory diseaseReverse transcription polymerase chain reactionDiseasePneumovirusIntensive careMedicineParamyxoviridaeGeneImmunologyViral diseaseInternal medicineGene expressionIntensive care medicineGeneticsLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sequencing studies of the glycoprotein G gene were performed in human respiratory syncytial virus (hRSV) strains detected by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction directly from nasopharyngeal aspirates of hospitalized children < or =3 years old over 2 winters. Clinical data were compared between 106 children infected with group A hRSV (96 GA2 genotypes) and 94 children infected with hRSV group B (62 GB3 genotypes). A severity index was defined by assigning 1 point each for the use of >30% supplemental oxygen, admission to an intensive-care unit, and duration of hospital stay of >5 days. Group A and genotype GA2 strains were associated with greater severity of hRSV disease than were group B strains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations119
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207