MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161036554 · doi:10.23919/acc.2004.1383675

Analysis of steady state behavior of second order sliding mode algorithms

2004· article· en· W2161036554 on OpenAlexaff
Igor Boiko, Leonid Fridman, Rafael Iriarte

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsSNC-Lavalin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)ActuatorMode (computer interface)Sliding mode controlFrequency domainComputer scienceProcess (computing)Transient (computer programming)AlgorithmTime domainFunction (biology)Motion (physics)Periodic functionSteady state (chemistry)MathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisArtificial intelligenceNonlinear systemControl (management)Computer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analysis of a second order sliding mode algorithm, which is known as the super-twisting algorithm, is carried out in the frequency domain with the use of the describing function method. It is shown that in the presence of an actuator, the transient process converges to a periodic motion. Parameters of this periodic motion are analyzed. A comparison between the periodic solutions in the systems with higher order sliding mode controllers and the oscillations that occur in classical sliding mode systems with actuators is done.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207