Les organisations internationales, l’Union européenne et la politique sociale globalisée
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article a pour objectif d'analyser les politiques de globalisation et, en particulier, les politiques implicites des organisations internationales (organisations issues de Bretton Woods, OMC, agences sociales des Nations Unies, OCDE, etc.). En encourageant la globalisation économique, elles se sont engagées dans la prescription d'une série de politiques sociales qu'elles considèrent comme étant appropriées dans un contexte globalisé. Cela dit, une controverse internationale existe à l'intérieur ou entre ces organisations sur la forme et l'étendue des politiques sociales globales. Cet article présente tout d'abord les contenus du discours social global issu de ces organisations. Ensuite, il analyse l'émergence d'une argumentation en faveur d'une globalisation socialement responsable. Enfin, il analyse la contribution de l'Union européenne à ce discours global.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".