MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161048853 · doi:10.1139/o08-072

A novel testis protein, RSB-66, interacting with INCA1 (inhibitor of Cdk interacting with cyclin A1)

2008· article· en· W2161048853 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xu Chen, Tinghui Hu, Gang Liang, Maojun Yang, Shudong Zong, Shiying Miao, S. S. Koide, Linfang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCytoplasmSpermatidHeLaMolecular biologyCyclin-dependent kinaseTransfectionComplementary DNAImmunoprecipitationCell biologyGeneGeneticsCell cultureCell cycle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

rsb-66 is a novel gene from a suppression subtracted hybridization (SSH) library of round spermatid-specific cDNAs against those of primary spermatocytes. It was found to be specifically expressed in round spermatids. To explore the function of RSB-66, a yeast two-hybrid system was used to screen for potential interacting partners in a human testis cDNA library. HSD45, also known as INCA1 (inhibitor of Cdk interacting with cyclin A1), was identified as one of the positive clones. The interaction between RSB-66 and INCA1 was demonstrated to occur by GST pull down and coimmunoprecipitation. Using immunofluorescence, RSB-66 was found to be specifically expressed in round spermatids, mainly in the cytoplasm. When being transfected into HeLa cells, RSB-66 and INCA1 were found to be co-localized principally in the cytoplasm. The alpha helix in the RSB-66 C terminal and two amino acid residues (tyr117 and his119) appear to be crucial for its function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207