MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161061779 · doi:10.1002/jrs.2419

Vibrational spectroscopy study of hydrothermally produced scorodite (FeAsO<sub>4</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O), ferric arsenate sub‐hydrate (FAsH; FeAsO<sub>4</sub>·0.75H<sub>2</sub>O) and basic ferric arsenate sulfate (BFAS; Fe[(AsO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>1−<i>x</i></sub>(SO<sub>4</sub>)<sub><i>x</i></sub>(OH)<sub><i>x</i></sub>]·<i>w</i>H<sub>2</sub>O)

2009· article· en· W2161061779 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Raman Spectroscopy · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicArsenic contamination and mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanCanadian Light Source (Canada)McGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArsenateRaman spectroscopyChemistryFerricArsenicHydrateInfrared spectroscopySulfateInorganic chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Hydrothermal circulationMineralogyCrystallographyGeologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Three crystalline ferric arsenate phases: (1) scorodite; FeAsO 4 ·2H 2 O, (2) ferric arsenate sub‐hydrate (FAsH; FeAsO 4 ·0.75H 2 O) and (3) basic ferric arsenate sulfate (BFAS; Fe[(AsO 4 ) 1− x (SO 4 ) x (OH) x ]· w H 2 O) synthesized by hydrothermal precipitation (175–225 °C) from Fe(III)‐AsO 4 3− –SO 4 2− solutions have been investigated via Raman and infrared spectroscopies. The spectroscopic nature of these high‐temperature Fe(III)‐ AsO 4 3− –SO 4 2− phases has not been extensively studied despite their importance to the hydrometallurgical industrial processing of precious metal (Au and Cu) arsenic sulfidic ores. It was found that scorodite, FAsH and BFAS all gave rise to very distinct arsenate, sulfate and hydroxyl vibrations. In scorodite and FAsH, the distribution of the internal arsenate modes was found to be distinct, with the factor effect being more predominant in the crystal system. For the crystallographically unknown BFAS phase, vibrational spectroscopy was used to monitor the arsenate ↔ sulfate solid solution behavior that occurs in this phase where the molecular symmetry of arsenate and sulfate in the crystal structure is reduced from an ideal T d to a distorted T d or C 2 / C 2 v symmetry. With the new collected vibrational data of the pure phases, the use of attenuated total reflectance infrared (ATR‐IR) spectroscopy was finally extended to investigate the nature of the arsenate in an industrial residue generated by pressure oxidation of a gold ore, where it was found that the arsenate was present in the form of BFAS. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0120.013
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.006
Bibliometrics0.0070.013
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.012
Open science0.0080.004
Research integrity0.0050.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it