MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161079122 · doi:10.1039/b922254e

Glancing-angle Raman spectroscopic probe for reaction kinetics at water surfaces

2010· article· en· W2161079122 on OpenAlexaff
Sumi N. Wren, D. J. Donaldson

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAqueous solutionRaman spectroscopyChemistryHalideIodideKineticsMoleculeAnalytical Chemistry (journal)BromideOzonePhotochemistryPhysical chemistryInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report glancing-angle Raman spectra acquired at the surface of aqueous dimethyl sulfoxide solutions and demonstrate that this technique can be used to measure the surface concentration of solutes. The presence of some solute molecules at the surface suppresses the intensity of the OH-stretching band of water there. We used this phenomenon to study the interfacial reaction of gas-phase ozone with aqueous NaX solutions (X = Br, I) by monitoring the decrease in intensity of the OH-stretching band of water over time. UV-VIS analysis of the product solutions indicates that X(3)(-), formed from X(2) evolved in the ozonation reaction, is the species most likely responsible for the decrease in OH-stretching intensity at the surface. The dependence of the rate of OH-Raman signal loss at the water surface on the bulk halide concentration is well described by a Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetic model. The Langmuir-Hinshelwood parameters indicated that iodide has a approximately 50 times greater propensity for the surface compared to bromide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Chemistry Chemical PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207