MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161094964 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.117501

<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2860</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math>mesons as excited<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math>-wave<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo accent="true" stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math>states

2014· article· lv· W2161094964 on OpenAlexafffund
Stephen Godfrey, Kenneth Moats

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2014
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new charm-strange meson, the ${D}_{s1}^{*}(2863)$, has recently been observed by the LHCb Collaboration which also determined the ${D}_{sJ}^{*}(2860)$ to have spin 3. One of the speculations about the previously observed ${D}_{s1}^{*}(2710)$ is that it is the $1{^{3}D}_{1}(c\overline{s})$ state. In this paper we reexamine the quark model properties and assignments of these three states in light of these new measurements. We conclude that the ${D}_{s1}^{*}(2863)$ and ${D}_{s3}^{*}(2863)$ are the $1{^{3}D}_{1}(c\overline{s})$ and $1{^{3}D}_{3}(c\overline{s})$ states respectively and the ${D}_{s1}^{*}(2710)$ is the $2{^{3}S}_{1}(c\overline{s})$ state. In addition to these three states there are another three excited ${D}_{s}$ states in this mass region still to be found, the $2{^{1}S}_{0}$ and two $1{D}_{2}$ states. We calculate the properties of these states and expect that LHCb has the capability of observing these states in the near future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0110.008
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6430.733

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmologySame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207