Desbordamiento de lo político, conflictos y liderazgos en el espacio metropolitano
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La transformación del régimen mexicano supone cambios en la relación básica entre el ejercicio del control corporativo y las formas de “gobernar el conflicto” en el espacio metropolitano. En este texto se sostiene la hipótesis de una “crisis decisional”, concebida como una serie de transformaciones en la organización y el ejercicio de liderazgos sociales e institucionales en años recientes (1991-2002), como la constitución de una “nueva” modalidad de lo político. A través de una revisión de la literatura reciente y de la revisión de tres bases de datos, se demuestra que en el campo de los servicios públicos como el agua estos “nuevos” liderazgos favorecerían escenarios de desfase y de renovación en el ejercicio de la legitimidad estatal.-----The transformation of the Mexican regime implies changes in the basic relationship between corporate control execution and ways of “controlling conflict” in the metropolitan areas. This paper sustains the hypothesis of a “decisional crisis” that is conceived as a series of transformations of the organization, and the exercise of social and institutional leadership in recent years (1991-2002) as the constitution of a “new” political mode. Through the review of recent literature and three databases, it is proved that in public service areas such as water, these “new” leaderships favor gap and renovation scenarios in the practice of state legitimacy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".