MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161113319 · doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2014.09.006

Diabetes that impacts on routine activities predicts slower recovery after total knee arthroplasty: an observational study

2014· article· en· W2161113319 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of physiotherapy · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsCanadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in HealthCapital District Health AuthorityUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineWOMACDiabetes mellitusObservational studyPhysical therapyOsteoarthritisQuality of life (healthcare)Depression (economics)Prospective cohort studyCohort studyActivities of daily livingInternal medicineAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

QUESTION: In the 6 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), what is the pattern of pain resolution and functional recovery in people without diabetes, with diabetes that does not impact on routine activities, and with diabetes that does impact on routine activities? Is diabetes that impacts on routine activities an independent predictor of slower resolution of pain and functional recovery after TKA? DESIGN: Community-based prospective observational study. PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive cohort of 405 people undergoing primary TKA, of whom 60 (15%) had diabetes. PARTICIPANTS with diabetes were also asked preoperatively whether diabetes impacted on their routine activities. PARTICIPANTS were categorised into three groups: no diabetes (n=345), diabetes with no impact on activities (n=41), and diabetes that impacted activities (n=19). OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain and function were measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index within the month before surgery and 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery. Demographic, medical and surgical factors were also measured, along with depression, social support and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: No baseline differences in pain and function were seen among the three groups (p > 0.05). Adjusting for age, gender and contralateral joint involvement across the 6 postoperative months, participants with diabetes that impacted on routine activities had pain scores that were 8.3 points higher (indicating greater pain) and function scores that were 5.4 points higher (indicating lower function) than participants without diabetes. PARTICIPANTS with diabetes that doesn't impact on routine activities had similar recovery to those without diabetes. CONCLUSION: People undergoing TKA who report preoperatively that diabetes impacts on their routine activities have less recovery over 6 months than those without diabetes or those with diabetes that does not impact on routine activities. Physiotherapists could institute closer monitoring within the hospital and community settings for people undergoing TKA who perceive that diabetes impacts on their routine activities. [Amusat N, Beaupre L, Jhangri GS, Pohar SL, Simpson S, Warren S, Jones CA (2014) Diabetes that impacts on routine activities predicts slower recovery after total knee arthroplasty: an observational study.Journal of Physiotherapy60: 217-223].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it