Long-Term Circulatory Consequences of Perinatal Iron Deficiency in Male Wistar Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Perinatal iron deficiency (PID) has been reported to induce developmental abnormalities, including cardiovascular complications in rats. These complications are believed to be "programmed" by an aberrant perinatal environment because the changes persist long after the insult is corrected (ie, despite subsequent iron replenishment). Little is known about the mechanisms by which PID affects blood pressure in the offspring, although the kidney is likely to play a central role. The objective of this study was to investigate the circulatory complications of PID and the putative role of the kidney involved therein. Before and throughout gestation, female Wistar rats were fed either a low-iron diet (3 ppm/10 ppm Fe) or an iron-enriched diet (225 ppm Fe). After giving birth, all of the dams were placed on a standard grain-based diet. At 24 hours postpartum, hematocrits and hemoglobin levels from offspring of iron-deficient mothers were 60% and 59% of control values, respectively. Adult PID animals had greater mean arterial pressures (110 versus 106 mm Hg) and systolic blood pressures (129 versus124 mm Hg) than controls, as assessed by radiotelemetry. The relationship between renal arterial pressure and renal interstitial hydrostatic pressure, assessed in anesthetized rats, was blunted by 41% in the PID group compared with controls. In addition, arterial pressure changes were significantly greater in response to altered sodium in the PID animals compared with controls. These data confirm that PID adversely affects blood pressure control, which seems to be mediated, at least in part, by altered intrarenal hemodynamic properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".