MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2161158857 · doi:10.3852/10-235

Expression of genes of<i>Rhizoctonia solani</i>and the biocontrol<i>Stachybotrys elegans</i>during mycoparasitism of hyphae and sclerotia

2011· article· en· W2161158857 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMycologia · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyRhizoctonia solaniHyphaMicrobiologyGeneAntagonismGene expressionRhizoctoniaHost (biology)BotanyGeneticsReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knowledge of mycoparasitism has been focused on how antagonists affect pathogens in relation to mechanisms, metabolites and gene expression. Just as microbial antagonists use a diverse arsenal of mechanisms to dominate interactions with hosts, hosts also have diverse responses to counteract antagonism. In this study differential gene expression of eight mycoparasitism-induced genes and eight host-response genes was monitored during in vivo interactions between the mycoparasite Stachybotrys elegans and hyphae and sclerotia of the host, Rhizoctonia solani over 5 d of interaction. Using real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, comparative analyses demonstrated that hyphal and sclerotial structures triggered different expression patterns. These results indicated that multiple regulatory mechanisms might be involved. The high elevated expression of some genes belonging to the mycoparasite and the host suggest that these genes play an important role during the mycoparasitic process and host defense respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.547
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it